Institute for Creation (Credulous) Research (Retards), PO Box 2667, El Cajon, CA 92021 Voi
________________________________________________________________________
Institute for Creation Research, PO Box 2667, El Cajon, CA 92021
Voice: (619) 448-0900 FAX: (619) 448-3469
________________________________________________________________________
|||||| |||| |||| |||||||||| ||| |||||||| ||||||||||
|||| ||||| ||||| |||| ||||| ||||| ||||| |||| ||||
|||| |||||| |||||| |||| ||||| ||||||| |||| |||| ||||
|||| |||||||||||||| |||| ||||| |||| |||| |||| ||||
|||| |||| |||| |||| |||||||||| |||| |||| |||| ||||
|||| |||| || |||| |||| ||||||||||||| |||| |||| ||||
|||| |||| |||| |||| |||| |||| ||||| |||| ||||
|||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| |||||| |||||| ||||||| ||||
________________________________________________________________________
No. 184 "Vital Articles on Science/Creation" October 1988
________________________________________________________________________
The Meaning of "Day" in Genesis
by James Stambaugh, M.Div.*
Copyright (c) 1988 by I.C.R.
All Rights Reserved
* Mr. Stambaugh is Librarian at the Institute for Creation Research.
________________________________________________________________________
The length of the "days" of creation in Genesis has involved a major
controversy in Biblical interpretation among evangelicals for over 150
years. Many have sought to redefine the term in light of the
naturalistic presuppositions of modern scientism. Therefore, let us
attempt, honestly, to examine the evidence from Scripture.
The communication of language is through words and their use. We
must ask ourselves why Moses was using the words he did, and not other
words. What is the meaning he was trying to communicate to his original
audience and to us, as well? Why did Moses use the word "day" and not
the more generic term, "time?" Is there any significance to the
repeated use of numbers in the account ("first day," "second day,"
etc.)? Why are these "days" bounded by the terms, "evening and
morning?" As we examine the text of Genesis 1, answers to these
questions become clear.
THE MEANING OF "DAY"
Those who argue that the word "day" means "long age," point out that
the Hebrew word, YOM, can have a number of meanings, only one of which
is "day of 24 hours."[1] They further seek to strengthen their position
with the use of Psalm 90:4 and II Peter 3:8, comparing a day to a
thousand years. Both of these verses, however, are simply using figures
of speech (similes) to show that God is not constrained by the same time
parameters as are humans. These verses are really irrelevant to the
discussion of the meaning of "day," in Genesis 1.
It is recognized, of course, that the word "day" can be used with a
number of variations. It can have any of five meanings: 1) a period of
light; 2) a period of 24 hours; 3) a general, vague time; 4) a point of
time; 5) a year.[2] The context determines which of these is intended
by the writer. The English language also can have up to 14 definitions
for the word "day."[3] The reader should be reminded that the purpose
of language is to communicate. Moses wrote in a language that was meant
to communicate to his readers. Words must be defined by their
relationship to one another.[4] Word meaning must be determined from
within its context. It will be shown how the context defines the word in
Genesis 1.
The use of a number with the word "day" is very illuminating. This
combination occurs 357 times outside of Genesis 1. The combination is
used in four different ways, but each time it is used, it must mean 24-
hour periods of time. If the combinations had been intended to mean
long periods of time, both the texts and contexts then become
meaningless. A typical verse is Genesis 30:36: "And he (Laban) set
three days journey betwixt himself and Jacob." God frequently issued
commands that the people were to do or not to do certain things on a
given day. This use occurs 162 times. A good example is Exodus 24:16:
"And the glory of the Lord abode upon Mount Sinai, and the cloud covered
it six days, and on the seventh day He called unto Moses out of the
midst of the cloud." These are the most typical uses of the word "day"
with a number. Four times the terms are used to show a starting point.
Ezra 3:6 says, "From the first day of the seventh month they began to
offer burnt offerings unto the Lord." A number may also be used with
"day" to convey an ending point. An example is Leviticus 19:6: "It
shall be eaten the same day ye offer it, and on the morrow: and if ought
remain until the third day, it shall be burnt in the fire." It would
appear, then, that whenever the Old Testament uses a number with the
word "day," it means a 24-hour period of time without any demonstrable
exception.
If the meaning of the word "day" with a number always means a 24-hour
period of time outside of Genesis 1, then it should also mean a 24-hour
period of time inside Genesis 1. The words that Moses used to
communicate what God did during creation are very significant. If Moses
had meant to signify that the "days" were more than 24 hours in length,
he could easily have done so. If we are to understand what Moses wrote,
then the language he used must be understood in its normal meaning. The
normal meaning is that of 24-hour periods of time.
ABSENCE OF THE ARTICLE
Once we have determined the meaning of the term "day," we need also
to examine another problem connected with the days of Genesis 1. Some
writers have observed the absence of the article from the mention of
each of the first five days. They have concluded that Moses must have
meant to convey to his readers that at least those days were long
periods of time. They have noted that the normal use of the article is
to make the noun definite.[5] Gleason Archer makes the following
statement: "In Hebrew prose of this genre, the definite article was
generally used where the noun was intended to be definite."[6] The
genre, or the form of the literature (i.e., history as opposed to
poetry) he is referring to here, is history. Let us see if he is
correct in this use of the article.
The reader must be aware of two points regarding the use of the
article in Hebrew. First, the article is usually present in the
historical sections of the Old Testament for the sake of definiteness.
But this is not always the case. Second, Hebrew has more peculiarities
in its use of the article than most languages.[7] This should make the
reader very sensitive to the nature of the Hebrew language. The Hebrew
language is one that must be observed closely. The most common
observation among Jewish and Christian commentators is that the use of
the article on the last two days is to show the importance of the sixth
and seventh days.(8) This also is in full accord with the Hebrew
grammatical rule that the article may be used in this manner.[9] On the
basis of grammar alone, then, we are still justified in our
interpretation of "day" being 24 hours in length.
Also, there is another reason for the absence of the article. It
appears that numbers in the Hebrew language have a definitive quality in
themselves. Kautzsch refers to them as substantives,[10] yet the
meaning is the same. A substantive is a noun that one can touch, such
as a chair. He cites many examples where the number and noun occur
without the article, yet the meaning is definite. There are 13 other
occurrences similar to Genesis 1, where the noun does not have the
article but is with a number. In each of these other occurrences, the
English translation uses the definite article.[11] Therefore, we must
conclude that the absence of the article in Genesis 1 does not mean that
the days are long periods of time. Moses' point is still very clear:
The days are to be thought of as normal 24-hour days.
EVENING AND MORNING
The meaning of the term "day" must be seen in conjunction with the
use of "evening" and "morning." Those who would argue that the days are
long periods contend that these terms can have figurative meanings.(12)
But what is their meaning in the context of Genesis 1? We must ask
ourselves, how would the people have understood these terms "evening"
and "morning"? Is Moses, and by extension, God, trying to deceive us by
not telling us the truth about the length of the "days?"
The Old Testament records 38 times when these two words are used in
the same verse. Each time they occur, the meaning must be that of a
normal day. Here are a couple of examples to illustrate the point:
Exodus 16:8 says, "And Moses said, this shall be when the Lord shall
give you in the evening flesh to eat, and in the morning bread to the
full." Also Exodus 18:13, "and the people stood by Moses from the
morning until the evening." All the other occurrences are essentially
the same. So then, it would appear that when the words "morning" and
"evening" are used in the same verse, they must refer to a normal day.
STATEMENT BY GOD
God did not leave the length of the creation days open to question.
He told us the exact length of each day. In Exodus 20:11, He said that
in "six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that is in
them and rested on the seventh day."
The context of the statement is an emphatic command. God tells the
people, "remember" and "keep" the Sabbath. God then tells them how to
keep the Sabbath in their daily lives. The people can tell whether they
are keeping the Sabbath if they are resting on the seventh day. God
then anchors the reality of the present days to the reality of the past
days of creation. God has set the pattern of Israel's work week. The
"days" are the same kind of days that the people would have readily
known. As it has been demonstrated previously, "day," used with a
number, means a 24-hour day. It seems obvious that all throughout
Israel's history, the people have understood this to mean a 24-hour day.
Even those who hold to the long ages of Genesis 1 acknowledge the "days"
of Exodus 20:8-11 to be 24-hour days.[13] Therefore, the "days" of
creation must also have been 24 hours in length.
CONCLUSION
What can we conclude concerning the length of the "days" of creation?
The usage of the word "day," with a number, means a 24-hour period. The
absence of the article does not alter that meaning. Further, the use of
"evening" and "morning" indicates that normal time is meant in Genesis
1. God, Himself, said that the creation took only six days. We also
must ask ourselves, did Moses and God deceive us by using the word
"day," when it really was a long period of time? If our answer is yes,
then we should not use the Bible for any of our beliefs. For, if God can
deceive us concerning the events of creation, He might have done that in
regards to the life, death, and resurrection of our Lord. The bottom
line is that we then can have no confidence in God's Word, if the
long-day view is held. It is far better to believe God at His Word, and
take the creation days as 24-hour days.
REFERENCES
1. For typical arguments, examine Davis Young, _Creation and the
Flood_. Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1977, pp. 83, 84.
2. _Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament_, I:371.
3. _Webster's 20th Century Dictionary, unabridged_.
4. Beekman, John and John Callow. _Translating the Word of God_. Grand
Rapids: Zondervan, 1974, p. 69.
5. Kautzsch, E. _Gesenius' Hebrew Grammar_, 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon
Press, 1980, p. 404.
6. Archer, Gleason, _Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties_. Grand Rapids:
Zondervan, 1982, p. 61.
7. Kautzsch, pp. 406, 407.
8. One should consult Jewish commentators Cassuto, Rashi, and Cohen.
Some of the Christian commentators are Keil, Leupold, and E. J.
Young.
9. Kautzsch, p. 408.
10. Kautzsch, p. 432.
11. The occurrences are Numbers 11:19; I Samuel 1:1; I Chronicles 12:39;
II Chronicles 20:25; Ezra 8:15,32; Nehemiah 2:11; Daniel
1:12,14,15; 12:12,13; and Jonah 3:4.
12. Ross, Hugh. Genesis One: A Scientific Perspective. Sierra Madre:
Wiseman Productions, 1983, p. 16.
13. Archer, pp. 116, 117, also Henry Alford, _The Book of Genesis and
Part of Exodus_. Minneapolis: Klock and Klock, 1979, pp. 313,
314.
________________________________________________________________________
This "Impact" was converted to ASCII, for BBS use,
from the original formatted desktop article.
Comments regarding typographical errors
in the above material are appreciated.
Don Barber, ICR Systems Administrator
Fax: (619) 448-3469
All ICR staff members adhere to a Statement of Faith
in the form of two documents:
"Tenets of Scientific Creationism"
and "Tenets of Biblical Creationism."
(see Impact No. 85)
________________________________________________________________________
As a missionary organization, ICR is funded by God's people. The
majority of its income is provided by individual donors who desire to
proclaim God's truth about origins. Gifts can be designated for
research, the graduate school, seminars, or any special part of the ICR
ministry. All others will be used where most needed. We pledge to use
them wisely and with integrity.
If you would like to receive our free monthly newsletter "Acts & Facts,"
or our free quarterly devotional Bible-study booklet "Days of Praise,"
just request them by contacting ICR at (619) 448-0900.
________________________________________________________________________
We believe God has raised up ICR to spearhead Biblical Christianity's
defense against the godless dogma of evolutionary humanism. Only by
showing the scientific bankruptcy of evolution, while exalting Christ
and the Bible, will Christians be successful in "the pulling down of
strongholds; casting down imaginations, and every high thing that
exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into
captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ" (II Corinthians
10:4,5).
Member, Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability
--- *** ---
E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank