Day Six +quot;Let the earth bring forth living creatures after their kind, cattle, and cre
Day Six
"Let the earth bring forth living creatures after their kind,
cattle, and creeping things, and beasts of the earth after their kind,"
thunders the Creator. Complete and immediate obedience is the response
reflected in the pithy phrase: "And it was so." These three terms
(i.e., cattle, creeping things, and the beasts of the earth) are
obviously intended to encompass the whole animal kingdom, excluding
only the creatures of day five, and man. There is no doubt that the
creatures of days five and six included the multitudes of currently
extinct animals (e.g., dinosaurs) with which the fossil record is
replete. There is no justification for the notion that dinosaurs
inhabited an Earth which was destroyed before the Genesis week of
creation (see Thompson, 1977, pp 167-200).
The Earth is finally in a state of readiness for the crowning glory
of all creation---mankind. The creation of man differs from that of all
other life in at least the following ways. First, a divine conference
precedes the forming of man. Second, man is created in the "image of
God." Third, man is said to have been "formed" by God, and not
commanded to appear. Fourth, life is "breathed" into man by God. Fifth,
the sexes of mankind are not created simultaneously, as in the case of
the rest of Earth's life. Sixth, the first female is "built" from a
section of the first male's "flesh and bone." Whereas evolution
portrays man as simply an advanced member of the animal kingdom, these
facts speak eloquently of man's complete separation from the animal
realm. Man must be very careful not to minimize his importance (see
Psalm 8). These considerations are contradicted by all stripes of
evolution. One cannot escape a confrontation with them if he is to
claim that there is "amazing agreement" between evolution and the
Bible.
Unlike any of the other creatures, man alone bears a special
resemblance to God. The meaning of the terms "in His image" and "after
His likeness" has occupied the minds of scholars since time immemorial.
Thomas Aquinas offers the following thoughtful explanation: "The image
implies an intelligent being endowed with free choice and self-
movement" (`Summa II', p 609). This explanation is consistent with
divine revelation, but one further point should be added. The spirit of
man which expresses itself through these capacities for reasoning and
independent volition, is not limited to them. James' statement that the
body without the spirit is dead teaches, by implication, that as long
as there is life in a human body, its spirit is also present (James
2:26).
After Adam named the animals which the Creator brought to him, his
lack of human companionship became evident. Unlike the animals, which
all had mates that were "meet" (i.e., suitable) for each other, Adam
was alone. God evaluates the situation as "not good" and takes the
necessary action to resolve the problem. The man is put to sleep while
God removes a rib from his side (the Bible is silent as to which side),
and God "builds" from it the first woman. Following this operation,
God presents Adam with his wife. Adam's response seems full of
excitement: "This is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh: she
shall be called Woman because she was taken out of Man." Adam had
earlier called the animals various names apparently corresponding to
his perception of them; now, he calls his helpmeet, "Woman" because he
correctly perceives that she was taken from him. It is not until after
the expulsion from the garden that the name "Eve" is given.
How will the theistic evolutionist attempt to harmonize this
account with evolution? With the creation of mankind now complete,
evening falls and morning returns, concluding the sixth day.
E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank
|